Ivan Hoffman, B.A., J.D.
October 25, 2018:
I got started in the “peace movement” as part of the anti-nuclear movement in the early 1980s. At that time, the Soviets and the United States had both long range and intermediate range nuclear missiles. The Soviets said they would attack Europe with their missiles if those countries allowed US missiles to be deployed in Europe. Then the two countries signed the Intermediate Range Nuclear Missile Treaty in 1987 and I thought that such talk was over. Now we are again hearing the same threats from Russia because of the proposed withdrawal of the US from the treaty. The perpetual war mindset. It never ends. https://www.yahoo.com/news/russias-putin-says-respond-kind-u-withdraws-inf-170104842--business.html
October 25, 2018:
Amid all the other reporting, A federal judge in Georgia has blocked the enforcement of the “matching signature” rules unless there is a right to object and prove identity after notice. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/judge-orders-ga-officials-to-stop-tossing-absentee-ballots-over-signatures/2018/10/24/9c5a5b06-d7bd-11e8-a10f-b51546b10756_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.7ea9a1ed6e84
October 27, 2018:
In the accompanying article about the ACA lawsuit, given the political implications no matter what decision the court reaches, perhaps the court will not hand down its decision until after the mid-term elections. Some could see this as the politicization of the judicial branch of government, which is supposed to be above those matters.
October 30, 2018:
The Supreme Court yesterday declined to hear an appeal of a decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that upheld lower court’s ruling that the 2011 re-drawing of the voting districts (“gerrymandering”) by the Republicans violated the state’s constitution. This means that the districts that will be applicable for the mid-terms are those re-drawn by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Good news for democracy. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/413616-supreme-court-turns-away-gop-challenge-to-new-pennsylvania-electoral
The District Court judge in the emoluments clause lawsuit brought by the District of Columbia and the state of Maryland (read “The Emoluments Clauses”) denied the stay of the case that the President requested. This means that discovery about the President’s business interests in the Trump International Hotel in D.C. can proceed.
November 7, 2018:
Now that the Democrats are in
control of the House, we can at least have the checks and balances that the
But expect a significant amount of lame duck legislation
in the next few weeks from the Republicans who are still in control of both
New Congress won’t be inaugurated until January 3, 2019 (20th Amendment, Clause 1) but they can appoint a different day (Clause 2). That’s at least 57 days away! We're only on day 1!
Also, remember that even if the Congress does not repeal Obamacare (“the ACA”), there is still pending the Texas vs. US case seeking to declare it unconstitutional. The effect would be the same as a repeal and during, the pendency of any appeals, there would be great confusion and uncertainty. Read “The ACA Lawsuit and Its Implications” at http://www.ivanhoffman.com/ACA.html
Copyright © 2018 Ivan Hoffman. All Rights Reserved.
If you wish to repost portions of these Briefs on social media, kindly credit the author and this web site. Otherwise, no portion of these Briefs may be copied, retransmitted, reposted, duplicated or otherwise used without the express written approval of the author.
Ivan Hoffman has been practicing intellectual property law for over 45 years and has written extensively about that topic. (www.ivanhoffman.com). Additionally, Ivan Hoffman has written numerous books about philosophy including “The Tao of Love” and “The Tao of Money.”
These Briefs are not legal advice and are not intended as legal advice. These Briefs are intended to provide only general, non-specific legal information. These Briefs are not intended to cover all the issues related to the topic discussed. You should not rely on these Briefs in any manner whatsoever and you should not draw any conclusions of any sort from these Briefs. The specific facts that apply to your matter may make the outcome different than would be anticipated by you. These Briefs are based on United States laws but the laws of other countries may be different. You should consult with an attorney familiar with the issues and the laws of your country. These Briefs do not create any attorney client relationship and are not a solicitation.